Healthcare fraud intelligence built to surface exclusion-linked control risk.

SentinelGraph helps qualified professionals identify exclusion-linked control risk using structured public-source intelligence, entity-resolution methods, and evidence-traceable reporting designed to support professional review.

Public-source intelligence. Human-reviewed findings. Evidence-traceable reporting.

22M+

entities tracked

209,000+

active leads

26,000+

critical-priority

5,500+

gold stars validated

21

data sources

What We Do

Structured intelligence for exclusion-linked risk

SentinelGraph maps the relationships between excluded individuals, healthcare entities, and the control structures that connect them using publicly available records.

The platform is designed to help qualified professionals identify patterns that are difficult to detect through standard screening alone: active control roles, post-exclusion enrollment, cross-entity linkage, and reimbursement-linked risk.

Entity & Control Mapping

We identify the corporate structures, officer roles, registered agents, and operational patterns that may indicate ongoing control by excluded individuals — even when that control is not immediately visible.

Exclusion Cross-Referencing

Every entity and individual in the graph is cross-referenced against OIG-LEIE, SAM.gov, state Medicaid exclusion lists, and related federal and state enforcement actions.

Evidence-Traceable Findings

Every observation is linked to a specific public record, filing, or data source. Nothing is inferred without attribution. Nothing is presented without a chain of evidence.

Review-Grade Reporting

Outputs are designed for use by attorneys, investigators, and compliance officers. Structured findings, not raw data. Confidence-rated, not speculative.

Court & News Validation

Every critical lead is cross-referenced against federal court records and news coverage to identify cases already under prosecution or public scrutiny — validating our findings and identifying net-new discoveries.

Continuous Intelligence Cycle

The platform refreshes daily — ingesting new data, rescoring leads, and cross-referencing against courts and news. This is a living intelligence engine, not a static report.

Sample Dossier

What an investigator-ready report looks like

Below is a redacted preview of a real Investigation Memo. Sensitive fields are masked, but the structure, evidence chain, and depth are exactly what subscribers receive.

Every dossier includes

  • Personalized header

    Subscriber name, report ID, generation timestamp — every report watermarked

  • Subject profile + risk score

    Full identity, NPI, state, scoring breakdown

  • Narrative analysis

    Plain-English explanation of what the data shows

  • Proof ladder

    Step-by-step evidence checklist with confirmed and pending items

  • Open questions

    Unverified elements that warrant further analyst review

  • Recommended next step

    Structured path for deeper review, escalation, or referral

Want to try it yourself? Browse our live sample data — over 1,000 real masked leads from the intelligence graph. Click any row to generate a sample report in any of our four formats.

Explore the live sample data

CONFIDENTIAL MATTER SUMMARY

CLASSIFICATION: PRELIMINARY

Investigation Memo

Prepared for:
[Demo Session]
Report ID:
SG-2026-04-11-A8F2Q

Subject

Em****ld Med****l C****r LLC

NPI ******4821 · FL · corporate_sanction_match

95
Risk Score
Narrative

Subject Em****ld Med****l C****r LLC (NPI ******4821) was identified through cross-referencing the █████████ exclusion list against active Medicare enrollment data maintained by █████████. The match was established using corporate name exact with a confidence level sufficient for human review.

The subject is registered in FL and currently holds an active operational status despite the exclusion. ████████████████████████ indicating that billing activity may continue despite the sanction. Federal court records confirm a related case filed in █████████ District Court on █████████.

Proof ladder
Identity confirmed
Exclusion verified (source: █████████)
Active enrollment confirmed
Court record found
Damages quantified
Open questions
  • Full ownership chain through state corporate filings: █████████
  • Related entities at the same registered address: █████████
  • Historical enrollment changes and effective dates: █████████

Subscribe to see all identifier information and remove redacted data

Sample report with sensitive fields masked (shown as █). Subscribers receive fully unredacted versions with complete evidence chains.

Investigation Memo (Tier 2) — one of four report formats available

Why It Matters

Exclusion-linked control is difficult to detect — and easy to miss

Hidden in plain sight

Excluded individuals frequently maintain influence over healthcare entities through family members, business associates, or layered corporate structures. Standard screening tools check names — not control relationships.

Costly when missed

When excluded individuals continue to control billing entities, the resulting claims may be considered false under the False Claims Act. Liability can extend to payers, contractors, and downstream providers who failed to detect the risk.

Difficult to assemble manually

Tracing control through corporate filings, licensing boards, property records, and enforcement histories across multiple states is time-consuming and error-prone. SentinelGraph automates the assembly; human analysts validate the findings.

Process

How SentinelGraph works

SentinelGraph turns fragmented public records into structured, reviewable intelligence.

01

Data foundation

We ingest and structure public records — exclusion lists, corporate filings, licensing data, enforcement actions, court records, and property filings — into a unified entity graph.

02

Entity resolution

Individuals and organizations are resolved across data sources using name, address, license number, and corporate role matching — producing a single view of each actor and entity.

03

Control mapping

We map the relationships between excluded individuals and active healthcare entities — identifying officer roles, registered agent connections, address overlaps, and other indicators of potential control.

04

Review and reporting

Every finding is reviewed by a human analyst before delivery. Outputs include confidence ratings, evidence citations, and structured recommendations for follow-up.

05

Continuous validation

Critical leads are cross-referenced daily against federal court records and news coverage. Leads confirmed by public prosecution or reporting become validated catches — proving the system's accuracy.

Why SentinelGraph

What makes this different

Control-focused, not just name-based

Most exclusion screening checks names against a list. SentinelGraph maps the corporate and relational structures that indicate whether an excluded individual may still exercise control.

Evidence-traceable, not black-box

Every finding links directly to a public source document. Nothing is inferred without attribution. This makes outputs reviewable, defensible, and suitable for legal or compliance use.

Built for professional workflows

Outputs are structured for use in investigations, compliance audits, and legal briefings — not as raw data feeds. We deliver review-grade findings, not dashboards.

Public-source by design

SentinelGraph works exclusively with publicly available records. This means our methodology is transparent, our findings are independently verifiable, and our process does not depend on proprietary or privileged data sources.

Example Matters

The kinds of patterns SentinelGraph surfaces

These are representative composites based on commonly observed patterns. They illustrate the types of findings SentinelGraph produces — not specific investigations. No real individuals or entities are described.

Corporate shell layering

An excluded individual is removed as an officer from a healthcare entity. Within months, a new LLC is formed at the same address, with a family member listed as the registered agent. The new entity begins billing Medicaid.

Cross-state reconstitution

A provider excluded in one state appears as a controlling officer of a newly formed entity in another state, using a slightly different name variant. The new entity applies for Medicaid enrollment.

Address and role clustering

Multiple healthcare entities share a registered address, phone number, or officer with an entity previously linked to an excluded individual. Billing patterns overlap in ways that may suggest coordinated control.

Who We Serve

Built for professionals who need structured signal, not noise

Healthcare Fraud Attorneys

Counsel pursuing or defending False Claims Act cases, qui tam actions, or exclusion-related matters. SentinelGraph provides structured control-mapping intelligence to support case development and risk assessment.

Federal & State Investigators

OIG, DOJ, state AG, and MFCU investigators working exclusion-related or program-integrity cases. SentinelGraph accelerates identification of control patterns that may warrant further investigation.

Compliance Officers

Healthcare organizations, managed care plans, and PBMs responsible for ensuring their provider networks do not include entities controlled by excluded individuals. SentinelGraph provides deeper screening than standard name-match tools.

Program-Integrity Stakeholders

State Medicaid agencies, Medicare contractors, and other payer-side integrity teams. SentinelGraph supports proactive risk identification across provider enrollment and network adequacy workflows.

Methodology

How trust and proof are established

Every SentinelGraph finding is built on a layered framework of evidence quality, source reliability, and confidence assessment.

Public-record attributionCross-source corroborationTemporal consistency checksEntity-resolution confidenceHuman analyst reviewEvidence-chain documentation

The goal is not simply to detect a pattern, but to show what is known, what remains uncertain, and what should happen next.

Every finding is presented with source context, confidence framing, and unresolved questions. SentinelGraph does not make determinations of fraud, liability, or regulatory violation.

National Coverage

Public-source intelligence across all 50 states

SentinelGraph structures public-source healthcare, enrollment, sanction, and corporate records across the United States into actionable intelligence.

High activity (10,000+ leads)
Elevated (2,000–10,000)
Moderate (500–2,000)
Baseline (<500)

SentinelGraph monitors exclusion-linked control risk across all 50 states, with deep coverage in high-activity regions.

Geographic visualization reflects public-source data coverage. It is not a determination of fraud concentration or prevalence.

22M+

entities tracked

209,000+

active leads

26,000+

critical-priority

5,500+

gold stars validated

21

public-source datasets

50

states with active coverage

Request a confidential briefing

If you work in healthcare compliance, fraud investigation, legal oversight, or program integrity — and want to understand how SentinelGraph approaches exclusion-linked control risk — we would welcome a confidential conversation.

What SentinelGraph is not

Not a law firm or legal advisor

Not a determination of fraud, liability, or regulatory violation

Not a substitute for investigation or legal judgment

Not a consumer screening tool

Not a replacement for qualified professional review

SentinelGraph is an intelligence and review-support platform built from public-source records and other lawful-source materials. All findings are preliminary, evidence-traceable observations. Independent professional review is always required.

Important disclaimer: SentinelGraph provides structured intelligence based on publicly available data. It does not provide legal advice, conduct investigations, or make determinations of fraud, liability, or regulatory violation. All findings are preliminary, evidence-traceable observations intended to support — not replace — qualified legal, investigative, or compliance review. Use of this service does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional engagement unless separately agreed in writing.